It has become all too apparent through the excessive and unscrupulous actions of certain elected officials in recent years that we Americans have lost control of our own destinies and have forgotten our essential responsibility to uphold the ideals of ’civic virtue’. In order to awaken our collective self from a pathetic state of social apathy and regain our American identity we must re-familiarize ourselves with the actions and words of our founders….the words of our Nationhood and the Spirit of the individual. For solutions to so called democratic deficits and problems of cultural passivity Americans need look no further than their own history books for salvation.
At least half of the ‘Facts’ cited against the tyrants of old that are listed in our own Declaration of Independence are already visible in the current administration’s policies and practices. How many more of these Facts need be repeated before we as a people wake up and begin to protect our personal and collective interests as well as those of our future generations?
The day has come to assert our selves en masse by right of the franchise or by revolution itself against the corrupt bureaucrats and corporate robber barons who control the levers of power in the United States of America before the remainder of our cherished unalienable Rights are snatched from us forever.
I ask of all those who stop here and read these words to please leave your own favorite passages or quotes pertaining to the issue in the comments section. Thanks.
———————————————————————–
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton
Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott
New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean
Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton
North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton
The Declaration of Independence
45 responses so far ↓
1loneranger // April 12, 2007 at 7:15 am |
Patrick Henry in response to British aggression.
“No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope that it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen, if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve.
This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth — to know the worst and to provide for it. I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past.”
1loneranger // April 12, 2007 at 7:46 am |
John Turley on the presidency and the constitution.
http://1loneranger.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/18/
1loneranger // April 12, 2007 at 8:00 am |
Benjamin Franklin was asked by a woman in a crowd on the street after leaving the Constitutional Convention:
“Mr. Franklin, what have you wrot?”
Franklin responded:
“It is a republic madam, if you can keep it.”
It is ours to lose.
boldscot // April 14, 2007 at 12:42 am |
Sorry to butt in.
Disgusted I was, and hardly able to contain my anger.
BBC report about the latest Brit casualty.
Will try my best:
‘The party was returning to base after a ‘re-assurance patrol’ when they saw a 5-man taliban team setting up an improvised devivice.
They were engaged when suddenly another 30 taliban appeared and killed one of the troops’
‘Re-assurance Patrol’
What TF is that?
Suddenly, the BBC is echoing Fox News in the reporting of a death of a young guy from the boondocks whose only choice was to join the army.
A ‘Re-assurance Patrol’?.
What the fuck is that?
Apologies for venting my ire.
In fact, no apologies someone must record it.
”Re-assurance Patrol’.
Do tell me.
anticant // April 14, 2007 at 6:40 am |
The great historic declarations of Rights – British 17th century, American and French 18th century, UN Human 2oth century – are inspiring beacons of progress in consciousness-raising, but they become snares and delusions and not worth the paper they were written on when they are subverted by wicked, greedy and unscrupulous power-seeking factions.
That is what has happened to your great country. What America needs now is a non-party – or cross-party – mass movement to Reclaim the Constitution.
Jose // April 14, 2007 at 6:45 am |
I am not an expert in the US constitution for obvious reasons, 1loneranger, but this post of yours somehow makes me evoke the times of the last Spanish dictatorship and the transition to what is now called democracy. I must say that I can see many points of convergence between the present situation in the US and what the dictatorial regime did in Spain. Absence of fundamental rights through the excuse of the hypotetical threat of a Judaeo-Masonic, redcoloured, anti-patriotic, anti-God fate to the country.
This was changed in the transition to democracy, but the mechanisms by which democracy works are not those a perfect democracy should demand from the citizens, in fact in many aspects it seems to me more like a “shared” dictatorship.
Party politics in most cases are above the real needs of the population.
In my opinion the beginning of the US as a country worked smoothly because it wasn’t then controlled by partisan targets. The target then was the independence and welfare of ALL Americans.
Do you think there’s any ressemblance with what we are witnessing today?
earthpal // April 14, 2007 at 8:31 am |
Hi Loneranger.
I’ve recently become aware of a book by Kurt Vonnegut entitled A Man Without A Country. I found it via MrZhisou’s blog. Vonnegut died this week.
You can read an extract from the book here…
http://books.guardian.co.uk/extracts/story/0,,1691370,00.html
From the article..”Our president is a Christian? So was Adolf Hitler. What can be said to our young people, now that psychopathic personalities, which is to say persons without consciences, without senses of pity or shame, have taken all the money in the treasuries of our government and corporations, and made it all their own?“
ImmortalMerkin // April 14, 2007 at 1:45 pm |
My father had a keyring. It said :
‘Sex, Breakfast of Champions’.
I quite like champignons.
1loneranger // April 14, 2007 at 3:59 pm |
Boldmeister-
Never an intrusion. Thanks for adding the info and commentary. I hadn’t heard about this yet. ‘Re-assurance Patrol’… Military jargon is inherently redickurous. FUBAR.
Sounds like a mosquito problem… smack one and it attracts a dozen more.
Anti-
Agreed. Subversion of these keystones is surely grounds for expulsion from these offices of authority. The Constitution Party than? And what of mass protest? Thank you for contributing again. It has been a while.
Jose-
I’m not sure how ’smooth’ the transition was…. loyalists being hanged, run off to Canada, brothers killing brothers etc…, I am looking for some sort of grass-roots democratic revolution. The question is how bad are things going to have to get for the majority before they feel it’s time to put it all out on the line? Candidates in the running are a disgusting joke… all of them…pathetic talking heads.
The stage may be setting up, the small encroachments, the restrictions and infringements that preempt revolution. More restrictions, than more protest until unjust enforcement on the population in some form by the government and then the catalyst… another Boston Massacre or Tea Party……. maybe an Oil Party?…. that is, if we make it that far along.
EP-
Thank you. It is time for some Vonnegut.
Merkman-
Cow shit champignons?
What constitutes freedom from the herd?
1loneranger // April 14, 2007 at 4:52 pm |
EP-
Funny, A friend from the orchestra sent these quotes from Vonnegut to my email last night. Thanks Mike!
Timely and timely….
“How about Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes?
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth.
Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God. And so on. Not exactly planks in a Republican platform. Not exactly George W Bush, Dick Cheney, or Donald Rumsfeld stuff. For some reason, the most vocal Christians among us never mention the Beatitudes. But, often with tears in their eyes, they demand that the Ten Commandments be posted in public buildings. And of course that’s Moses, not Jesus. I haven’t heard one of them demand that the Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes, be posted anywhere.
“Blessed are the merciful” in a courtroom? “Blessed are the peacemakers” in the Pentagon? Give me a break! It so happens that idealism enough for anyone is not made of perfumed pink clouds. It is the law! It is the US Constitution. But I myself feel that our country, for whose Constitution I fought in a just war, might as well have been invaded by Martians and body snatchers. Sometimes I wish it had been. What has happened instead is that it was taken over by means of the sleaziest, low-comedy, Keystone Cops-style coup d’état imaginable.”
“I was once asked if I had any ideas for a really scary reality TV show. I have one reality show that would really make your hair stand on end:
“C-Students from Yale”.
George W Bush has gathered around him upper-crust C-students who know no history or geography, plus not-so-closeted white supremacists… and plus, most frighteningly, psychopathic personalities, or PPs, the medical term for smart, personable people who have no consciences. To say somebody is a PP is to make a perfectly respectable diagnosis, like saying he or she has appendicitis or athlete’s foot. The classic medical text on PPs is The Mask of Sanity by Dr Hervey Cleckley, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the Medical College of Georgia, published in 1941. Read it! Some people are born deaf, some are born blind or whatever, and this book is about congenitally defective human beings of a sort that is making this whole country and many other parts of the planet go completely haywire nowadays. These were people born without consciences, and suddenly they are taking charge of everything. PPs are presentable, they know full well the suffering their actions may cause others, but they do not care. They cannot care because they are nuts. They have a screw loose!”
“And what syndrome better describes so many executives at Enron and WorldCom and on and on, who have enriched themselves while ruining their employees and investors and country and who still feel as pure as the driven snow, no matter what anybody may say to or about them? And they are waging a war that is making billionaires out of millionaires… and they own television, and they bankroll George Bush, and not because he’s against gay marriage. So many of these heartless PPs now hold big jobs in our federal government, as though they were leaders instead of sick. They have taken charge. They have taken charge of communications and the schools… They might have felt that taking our country into an endless war was simply something decisive to do. What has allowed so many PPs to rise so high in corporations, and now in government, is that they are so decisive. They are going to do something every fuckin’ day and they are not afraid. Unlike normal people, they are never filled with doubts, for the simple reason that they don’t give a fuck what happens next. Simply can’t. Do this! Do that! Mobilise the reserves! Privatise the public schools! Attack Iraq! Cut health care! Tap everybody’s telephone! Cut taxes on the rich! Build a trillion-dollar missile shield! Fuck habeas corpus and the Sierra Club and In These Times, and kiss my ass! There is a tragic flaw in our precious Constitution, and I don’t know what can be done to fix it. This is it: only nut cases want to be president. This was true even in high school. Only clearly disturbed people ran for class president.The title of Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 is a parody of the title of Ray Bradbury’s great science-fiction novel Fahrenheit 451. Four hundred and fifty-one degrees Fahrenheit is the combustion point, incidentally, of paper, of which books are composed. The hero of Bradbury’s novel is a municipal worker whose job is burning books. While on the subject of burning books, I want to congratulate librarians, not famous for their physical strength, who, all over this country, have staunchly resisted anti-democratic bullies who have triedto remove certain books from their shelves, and destroyed records rather than have to reveal to thought police the names of persons who have checked out those titles. So the America I loved still exists, if not in the White House, theSupreme Court, the Senate, the House of Representatives, or the media. The America I loved still exists at the front desks of our public libraries.”
Jose // April 14, 2007 at 5:47 pm |
Great!
anticant // April 14, 2007 at 6:04 pm |
No disrespect to your orchestra friend, but I think I saw that Vonnergut quote either on Information Clearing House or Truthdig, both of which are well worth looking at daily.
For a more realistic account of what really went on in the run-up to the American Revolution, read Theodore Draper’s “A Struggle for Power”. It’s a gripping read, and very enlightening.
1loneranger // April 14, 2007 at 8:02 pm |
Thanks Anticant for the suggestion. I just read a synopsis of this book and it looks interesting.
I just came back home from the lecture below.
Now that… was enlightening.
WAR ON TERRORISM AND ITS IMPACT ON CANADA IN AFGHANISTAN
Haroon Siddiqui
(Toronto Star Columnist)
Saturday, April 14, 07 at 2.30-4.30PM
MacMechan Auditorium
Killam Library, Dalhousie University
SPONSORED BY
MUSLIM STUDENT ASSOCIATION
AND
ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION OF NOVA SCOTIA
Haroon Siddiqui is columnist for The Toronto Star, Canada’s largest
newspaper. He has just returned from an extensive tour of Pakistan, along
the Afghan border, and also parts of the Middle East, South Asia and the Far
East.
He has been editorial page editor, national editor, news editor and foreign
affairs analyst. He has reported from more than 30 countries and covered
such events as the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, the
Iranian revolution, the Iran-Iraq war, the war on terrorism, the emergence
of India as an economic power and, of course, the evolution of Canada as a
post-modern state.
He is author of the best-selling Being Muslim (Groundwood Books, Toronto and
Berekley, 2006), a critique of post-9/11 politics.
He has been awarded the Order of Canada, the nation’s highest civilian
honour, along with the Order of Ontario, and numerous journalistic awards.
He is the immediate past president of PEN Canada and a former director of
the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the Canadian Managing Editors
Conference and the Ontario Press Council, among others.
1loneranger // April 14, 2007 at 8:24 pm |
Siddiqui’s observations could be summed up by saying the “war” on terrorism is without a doubt causing more terrorist activity and creating new organizations around the world than it is preventing and the only viable solution to preventing more rogue factions from forming is to negotiate with established terrorist organizations rather than bombing the shit out of their country sides. Perhaps not earth shattering info here, but reassuring to hear from someone in the main stream media who has been there and back again very recently. The audience was mainly Muslim and many interesting questions and comments were shared by the audience.
anticant // April 14, 2007 at 8:31 pm |
Yes, that is both predictable and sensible. But the question is, do the perpetrators of the “war on terror” WANT to dumb it down before they have achieved their hidden objectives? As they obviously don’t, the only way to inject more sanity is to turf them out of office and power, and this depends upon the US electorate. So far, the Demofrats have been pretty feeble even though they do control Congress. So what is the answer?
anticant // April 14, 2007 at 8:33 pm |
“Demofrats” was a typo, but maybe hits the mark!
anticant // April 14, 2007 at 8:34 pm |
Or could be “Demorats”??…………..
Jose // April 15, 2007 at 5:47 am |
I observe, though, that apparently Democrats are starting to show their claws, or so Nancy Pelosi seems to give us to understand.
I don’t trust them notwithstanding, the process of their election is not sufficiently clear.
Merkin // April 15, 2007 at 7:58 am |
DemoPrats?.
1loneranger // April 15, 2007 at 12:22 pm |
Demo-lacks! and Demohacks.
Jose- the Speaker sure is stepping
inout in a big way, the verbal attacks, the trips abroad, the talk shows….. I have yet to make up my mind about her myself. She seems to have good intentions, but there’s something that’s rubbing my fur the wrong way.Anti-The more they numb it down, the easier it is to expose them for the frauds they are. No worries.
boldscot // April 15, 2007 at 1:35 pm |
Well, how can you describe it?.
Us brits slag fuck out of you guys for having no choice in these matters.
We are just as bad – we have Brown or Cameron.
In effect, no choice.
This is why they don’t want us to speak together.
Eventually, we will say what we ‘want’, what we think is possible.
I don’t know the answer.
All I know is that we don’t want this ’shower of bastards’ that we have at present.
anticant // April 15, 2007 at 8:33 pm |
Ranger – the USA has many genuine friends in the UK and throughout Europe. Our dismay at some aspects of American policy – especially the monumental blunders since 9/11 – does not mean that we are ‘anti-American’, as some of your more gung-ho compatriots wrongly assume.
All democracies are flawed, but they are still far better than any alternatives. What we have to do in our respective countries is to mobilise our fellow-citizens to ensure that the power we delegate to our representatives is used responsibly. This won’t be easy, and will take time, but we CAN do it!
1loneranger // April 15, 2007 at 11:53 pm |
Anticant-
Thanks for the unusually optimistic thoughts Anti. I’m beginning to realize the support many UKers and Europeans offer to /reasonable/ Americans. I hope you know there are many of us colonists who have plenty of respect and and an open ear for the lessons and friends in the old world too.
I’ve been accused by some of my fellow Americans as being anti-American because I question the authority, logic and ethics of my own country… there is nothing worse than that…. so in comparison, any cultural attack on me or my compatriots by irrational ‘foreigners’ spouting anti-Americanisms usually spills off the back like water. I understand the concerns, but these people don’t seem to realize that there are a whole lot of us living over here who oppose our current government officials and their policies. And of course this issue is generally interpreted thusly, the Brit who rants on the everyday American for the actions of his/her President is often the worse kind of hypocrite. I think it’s safe to say that the Americans still have a bit of catching up to the Brits to do in terms of savage and misguided foreign policy as well as religious extremism, historically speaking.
That being said, your sentiments are genuinely appreciated and duly noted.
Thanks.
And yes, I agree with you wholeheartedly,
“we CAN do it”, and the term you used -mobilise- is key. Get out there in any way shape or form and get involved.
Cheers to that. Have one for me in the snug tonight.
Tally-Ho!
anticant // April 16, 2007 at 9:06 am |
There is always some prospect for peaceful change for the better in a democracy – even such deeply flawed ones as the USA and UK currently are. Violence is only unavoidable where there is no accepted role for opposition.
In the 18th century, it took weeks for a message to cross the Atlantic. Now it takes less than a second. Surely the internet is one hopeful way of creating almost instantaneous coalitions of protest – including worldwide ones.
Most of our present troubles are caused by human folly, and can be successfully addressed by human wisdom.
But that needs time, pateience, determination – and money.
Jose // April 16, 2007 at 11:15 am |
A couple of days ago I joined a group in the Internet that were collecting firms to ask internationally for the resignation of Wolfowitz. Wolfowitz has shown tacitly who commands and has said he will stay as President of the World Bank.
To build up a clout in the web requires constance and decision, and above all a catalyst, otherwise the dissemination of multiple efforts will deprive them of the sufficient strength.
To paraphrase Romans, unite and you’ll win.
Are we talking here, by any chance, of the creation of a multinational force made up by normal people from all over the world?
Kind of a lobby, a group of pressure which will be listened to in the high spheres of each and every nation?
If so I am afraid we would be facing up to numberless handicaps not very easily overcome.
An interesting idea notwithstanding.
anticant // April 16, 2007 at 11:43 am |
Perhaps I am overoptimistic but my experience is that when tides turn, drastic transformations in the political weather can occur quite quickly. In Jungian terms, the dark side of humanity won’t stay triumpahnt for ever.
The problem we [=peaceably inclined honest people of goodwill] face now is that almost everywhere, unscrupulous villains and psychopathic scumbags have – temporarily, let us hope – seized the reins of power and control the international money bags.
As 1loneranger says, true patriotism does not consist of parrotting “my country right or wrong”, but of seeking to bring back our respective countries into the paths of civic virtue and conscientiousness.
This, as you say Jose, will not be easy – but I sense a growing mood that it is timely. I do not despair of the USA, because there is already an active debate going on there. In Islamic countries – where I am sure there are a great many honest and peaceable people too – the problem is that they have no legitimate voice so open debate is much harder.
I do find the daily quotations and articles in Tom Feely’s Information Clearing House very informative and encouraging, and one practical thing we can all do is to send him some money to keep going because he is very slenderly financed and is doing admirable work.
Winston Churchill said “Never despair, never surrender!”
anticant // April 16, 2007 at 1:52 pm |
Pursuing this theme, I do think that the era of the sovereign and/or nation state is nearly over, and that the time is ripe for the development of people-centred internationalist politics which cross national and even continental boundaries. The internet undoubtedly makes this feasible. The growth of such informal, populist groupings with common aims could quite swiftly become more effective, and democratic, than the stultified bureaucracies of the EU, NATO, etc.
boldscot // April 16, 2007 at 1:58 pm |
Anticant.
Well said, that man.
1loneranger // April 17, 2007 at 12:50 am |
Thank you all for contributing your considerate thoughts to this thread, especially Jose and Anti. (even if many did not deposit the requisite quotes ).
I am inclined to respond more to the comments of today, but I am unable. I am attempting to get my head around the massacre that took place in my home state today.
Needless…….. senseless…..profoundly troubling.
The media’s insistence to usurp the fundamental emotion of today’s events with blame and misdirection is just as senseless as the act itself.
If only we could stop asking God why these things happen….. stop relying on God to heal these woes and start, ourselves, to rehabilitate an injured society that breads the troubled souls that perpetuate atrocities of this sort……..
If ever there was an event to encourage firearm restriction and registration in America, this is it.
I’m spent.
anticant // April 17, 2007 at 1:35 am |
I have been reading several blogs concerning Islam in Europe, and while I agree with much of what is said I find it deeply troubling that almost all the American posters say “this is why we musn’t have restrictions on private gun ownership. We are going to have to defend ourselves.” Some even exhort Europeans to adopt American-type attitudes to gun-carrying.
I find this deeply depressing, especially in view of the fact that this year we have already had almost a dozen random killings with guns in London.
1loneranger // April 17, 2007 at 1:48 am |
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”
True, but guns do make it a lot easier.
I don’t know the answer Anti.
It’s a vicious cycle, but someone must make the first move and lay down one gun, the rest will follow.
Joe average ignorant fucked up American /DOES/ think having an automatic weapon under the bed will make a difference to the “inevitable invading hoard of ‘towel-heads’”.
“What the hell is our military industrial complex for Joe?”
Unbelievable excuse for the right to bear arms, unbelievable. Makes /me/ want to kill someone.
Sorry.Not sorry. Tis my freedom.
Jose // April 17, 2007 at 6:37 am |
If people have to defend themselves, then there’s a serious problem with the state. If people have to have guns handy to shoot anyone that seems to be attacking them, or carried away by an impulse, then the change is imperative in the whole of the state. It is the state that must change its departments, make them more workable and practical, and laws should be consistent with that change.
And never forget that the state is made up by all living in it. So we all have a duty to carry out this change. Individually and collectively.
My deep sympathies, 1loneranger.
boldscot // April 17, 2007 at 9:03 am |
Skynyrd said it all :
‘Hand guns are made for killin
Aint no good for nothin else
And if you like your whiskey
You might even shoot yourself
So why dont we dump em people
To the bottom of the sea
Before some fool come around here
Wanna shoot either you or me’
1loneranger // April 17, 2007 at 7:42 pm |
Thank you Jose. I’m feeling it today.
You and bamaboldscot’s Skynyrdism are right on the mark, so to speak.
earthpal // April 18, 2007 at 6:45 am |
Loneranger, so sorry about what happened to your countryfolk. Makes me feel very low and depressed to know this kind of thing happens.
Lots of issues arising again regarding handgun bans verus the right to bear arms etc. but I’ve no will to discuss them.
The world is mad.
1loneranger // April 18, 2007 at 9:47 pm |
Hi EP,
Thanks for the thoughts.
There is turning out to be a lot more media focus on the kinds of weapons that were used in this shooting than there was in past shootings. I think this is a positive outcome of the tragedy. People in the states are talking about guns like never before. Of course there are a lot of thoughts coming from both sides of the fence on this issue. It frustrates me as it does you. But I’m optimistic that more gun control and restriction and education will come from it.
My problem is I very much see the negatives and positives of both sides of the right to bear arms issue and I constantly contradict myself in regard to this topic.
It is no wonder, as I’m a pacifist who grew up in a house with guns and have owned a gun myself.
I have a good friend at work who’s friend was shot and killed at Virginia Tech. Her name is Jocelyne Couture-Nowak. Her story is here.
http://www.herald.ns.ca/Front/638319.html
I of course am from Virginia. Many of my high school classmates went to Virginia Tech. I auditioned for orchestras and bands at VT when I was a kid. It hits close to home. The ’shooter’ was from the same D.C. suburb that my dad lives in.
Last night I dedicated a lamentation of an English Horn solo in the second movement of the Ravel Piano Concerto to the spirit of the individuals that died and to the blurry future of America itself.
Needless to say, it was a difficult performance to get through, but it turned out to be one of the most rewarding performances of my career thus far.
Peace
Jose // April 19, 2007 at 7:09 pm |
A biologist from the University of La Laguna, the town I live in, also was in Virginia Tech during the massacre. She was instructed to stay in her office and not come out. Her account of the tragedy comes in one of the local newspapers here.
You are an excellent person, 1loneranger. I am honoured to exchange views with you.
earthpal // April 20, 2007 at 4:34 pm |
Hey Loneranger. Sorry to hear about your friend’s friend, Jocelyne. Heartbreaking story.
Your mixed feelings towards guns are understandable given your background. All I think is that if a person is so intent on mass killing like this, he or she will find a way regardless of any gun control or gun ban. That said, I am in the anti-gun crowd.
Your lamentation is a lovely tribute to the people of VT and their families.
Jose is right.
Warmest wishes to you and Mimi.
1loneranger // April 20, 2007 at 7:55 pm |
Hi EP and Jose-
Thanks again for the warm responses.
Jose, it is extraordinary how far reaching this shooting was. It is yet another perfect example of the ever shrinking world we live in. We all owe it to our selves to treat everyone we meet with the concepts expressed in your blog’s title page. Just the smallest thing, having the courtesy to open a door for a person at a shop, has far reaching ramifications. …a butterfly effect in practical application.
anticant // April 21, 2007 at 3:54 am |
Every individual death is a personal and human tragedy – especially when caused so senselessly by the actions of a madman. You are right, ranger, that every thought and action has far-reaching ramifications: a maggot enters a diseased brain in Washington and a huge car bomb explodes in Baghdad.
Sadly, there will always be senseless horrors such as this Virginia tragedy. If it plays its part in sensitising America’s collective conscience to the far more large-scale, deliberately plotted horrors being perpetrated elsewhere in the world, some good may come out of this evil.
None of these things are mere images on our television screens. They all have personal impacts and fatal resonances for somebody. I remember reading recently of a lady in Sarajevo saying that she switched her TV on and saw these unbelievable things occurring in Vukovar, a few miles down the road – and a week later they were happening in her own street.
That, alas, is the grim reality of the global village we now live in. “Never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
Jose // April 21, 2007 at 7:38 am |
Yes, it is a global village. As we use to say here: “the world is a handkerchief”, there are no distances, no unengageable hurdles, everything is at the reach of our hand.
Let’s make the right use of this capability we have now and not waste it.
Amen.
anticant // April 21, 2007 at 6:45 pm |
See “Liviu Librescu, Thank You” on gummihund [link from my arena]. Sickening, but that’s the real world we’re living in, sad to say.
MerkinOnParis // April 22, 2007 at 8:47 am |
http://bloggersontherun.blogspot.com/
Ranger, do pop in when you are feeling in the mood.
Once I can get through the technical issues a modicum of music may be introduced.
One question, (for LavvyBloo0) can you find your way round a euphonium and other sundry artifacts?
earthpal // April 25, 2007 at 4:15 pm |
Loneranger, you’ve been given a Thinking Blogger Award:
http://earthpal.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/thinking-blogger-awards/
little indian // April 26, 2007 at 10:09 am |
“…They cannot care because they are nuts. They have a screw loose!”
Sorry, I beg to differ.
They are nuts with just a threaded whole where their brains should be. No screws, none.
Over the years,
your (USA’s) policy makers
have made your economy a slave to the petrodollar.
Exporting a fiat currency
is now your only means to survival,
which in reality is worth less than the paper its printed on.
(Someday, even the source of that paper will get exhausted.)
What you are importing in return is hatred, hatred and more hatred.
What I am learning
from visiting certain blogs,
a large number of American people are
ignoring the problems within the country.
Instead they want to cure problems elsewhere.
The way I see it,
when your own children
are suffering and starving at home,
going out to save the world is stupidity.
It is denial in almost psychopathic proportions.
You have taught the world
a government is only ‘by and for the people’,
but you have forgotten yourself what it really means.
This is my learning of what is happening today, I am not putting up an argument.