1LONERANGER

America’s Face

February 26, 2007 · 16 Comments

453px-george-w-bush.jpg

Just look at the handsome devil…………………….those beady little eyes. 

After reading anticant’s latest fascinating post regarding some historical observations about America’s culture I was inspired to jot a few general and timely thoughts down regarding America’s Face on the world stage. 

 

Since moving from the States to Canada one of my personal missions has been to identify the elusive Canadian identity?  After six years of dwelling on this topic I’ve concluded that it is not multi-culturalism, as government officials would have us and the rest of the world believe, that is our collective identity, but more likely the public’s common connection to the environment. Canadian identity can be best described as the communal knowledge of the inevitability of winter’s coming.  Canadian residents are quite possessive of their environment’s ruff beauty which comprises most of the North American Continent.  Endless ocean coasts, vast prairies, countless lakes and the towering Rocky Mountains are the natural escape of many who seek refuge from the stresses of city life.  The Arctic tundra known as the “Great White North” holds a mythical status among Canadians and non-Canadians alike.  Virtually every Canadian is an avid outdoors-person and many families keep cottages in rural northern locals to escape their city dwellings down south near Uncle Sam’s border.  This fascination with the land is one likely candidate for the elusive Canadian identity.

 

That being said, upon initial observation a visitor or newcomer to Canada might not make this assessment.  Many Canadians are forced to express their identity by proclaiming how unlike Americans they are.  “We’re a lot like the States, but we’re nicer and more polite.”  I’m sure everyone reading here that has met a Canadian on a train or airplane knows what I’m talking about. 

This is certainly an understandable reaction for a relatively young country in search of a unique identity while living next door to the most powerful nation on the planet and attempting to become recognized among the world’s older and more established industrialized countries.

The comic, Robin Williams, said of the Maple Leaf country….” Canadians are like the residents of a loft apartment living above a house that’s throwing the greatest party on earth, and they’re not invited.”  It may seem that way to that comic and other Americans.  But after living here for six years, I’d have to say that sentiment actually rings hollow.

 

 

Could it be a similiar quest for a unique identity that many 19th century as well as modern critics of American behavior mistakenly describe as uncouth mannerisms? In an attempt to find themselves in the aftermath of Revolution, Americans proclaimed to abandon and distance them selves from most everything right and English, quite notably the Victorian Era’s rigid behavioral etiquette practiced by certain visiting English men and women. 

Perhaps in this attempt to find a unique national identity the fledgling American citizenry living in the “wilds of the west” lost some of the inherent “English civility” of their mother country.

After all, aren’t many of those 18th and 19th century American entrepreneurs just wayward Englishmen.

 

One question to ask our collective American self is this:

Has our early reactionary and gruff defensive posture towards everything British manifested itself into a modern Foreign Policy or was it just a fleeting reaction which helped us move on with our own national initiative and identity?

 

Of course, every nation embodies many sorts of behavioral traits, and it would be naive to presume and cliche to say that America and all Americans are ruffians as compared to certain “other” countries and the citizenry there in. 

 

But what could these stereotypical mannerisms so often applied to America and Americans say about the Domestic and Foreign Policy of the lone Super-power?  And what does our President’s language and behavior on the world stage say about us as a nation?

 

I find it quite disheartening to observe a certain American President and his administration embody these imposed stereotypes for the sake of seeming rebellious and individualistic when all it does is make him look like a giant ass.

It is a shame that America’s sometimes gruff exterior forces outsiders to recoil and draw half-baked stereotypes.  Since America took the reins of global power from the British in the 20th century and subjected itself to the world’s giant microscope we have had a difficult time dealing with the reality and constant awareness that our country is one of great contradiction.  America is a nation of great wealth and liberty as well as a nation of great poverty and repression.

The most important questions we must ask ourselves as modern Americans are:

Which vision and characteristics will Americans choose to embrace as they lose grip of the reins of global power to a rapidly developing Asian power?  And, what type of President will Americans elect to represent that collective vision?

Categories: Bush · BushCo. · Canada/U.S. · Canadian Culture · Canadian Politics · Cultural · U.S. Politics · iraq war · politics · war

16 responses so far ↓

  • Boldscot // February 26, 2007 at 12:34 am | Reply

    Sorry, but someone had to stick it on the thread.

    Hey, I’m not a lumberjack, or a fur trader….
    I don’t live in an igloo or eat blubber, or own a dogsled….
    and I don’t know Jimmy, Sally or Suzy from Canada,
    although I’m certain they’re really really nice.

    I have a Prime Minister, not a president.
    I speak English and French, not American.
    And I pronounce it ‘about’, not ‘a boot’.

    I can proudly sew my country’s flag on my backpack.
    I believe in peace keeping, not policing,
    diversity, not assimilation,
    and that the beaver is a truly proud and noble animal.
    A toque is a hat, a chesterfield is a couch,
    and it is pronounced ‘zed’ not ‘zee’, ‘zed’ !!!!

    Canada is the second largest landmass!
    The first nation of hockey!
    and the best part of North America

    My name is Joe!!
    And I am Canadian!!!

    http://geobay.com/bf0426

  • 1loneranger // February 26, 2007 at 12:37 am | Reply

    And don’t forget,

    “I drink a ton of beer!”

    Rock on Boldscot.
    Who says Canadians aren’t proud patriots?

  • fma7 // February 26, 2007 at 2:31 am | Reply

    You are such a fucking typical american, your stumbling generialities are patheticly without any sort of subtly what-so-ever.
    Asking you to identify – to hone in on specifics is likened to asking a monkey what is the correct time?

  • 1loneranger // February 26, 2007 at 3:10 am | Reply

    fma7-

    I can’t thank you enough for your eloquently worded comment. After checking out your informative site I see that you’re a Canadian as well. I’m so sorry I wasn’t able to lump you into the general Canadian diaspora too. Maybe next time.

  • fma7 // February 26, 2007 at 3:20 am | Reply

    apology accepted

  • fma7 // February 26, 2007 at 3:54 am | Reply

    moving right along..I went back and actually looked at your site. I am both a n xpat. Cape Breton Islander , been through Halifax many times as a younger man and have had the rare pleasure of cold shouldering the sanity for sale guy plus i’m hoping to also view the Peter Mackay ,’ ASSLICKER OF SATAN” video knock-off.

  • 1loneranger // February 26, 2007 at 4:21 am | Reply

    fma7-

    My “stumbling generalities” are all I have. I’ve never claimed to be a professional political/cultural expert or historian. I yam what I yam…..just a young “fucking typical american” living outside his country for the first time trying to figure out just a bit of the bigger picture.
    I apologize if I offend any Canadian/American sensibilities here, that is not my intention at all….. I’m whimsically attempting to use some of the stereotypes of one country to shine light on another. I’m not writing a dissertation thesis here. Probably not the smartest thing to do, but kind of fun.

  • earthpal // February 26, 2007 at 7:16 am | Reply

    HiLoneranger.

    An interesting read there. Thought-provoking.

    I met a Canadian once at the hospital where I work. He was a junior doctor and from his accent, I mistakenly assumed he was American. Upon asking him which state he was from, he very quickly (and defensively) informed me that he was Canadian, not American. It was around the time of the invasion of Iraq so I wonder if he felt the need to distance himself from any connections to America and its foreign policy of the time. Was a really nice guy.

  • Jose // February 26, 2007 at 9:25 am | Reply

    Excellent article, 1loneranger. In my view there is nothing which isn’t acceptable in your comments, on the contrary.

    That some cannot see it so, it is entirely their fault.

  • little indian // February 26, 2007 at 10:35 am | Reply

    When a party comes to an end.
    it leaves behind
    the rubbish and the drying puke on the carpet,
    and some bleary eyed individuals
    surveying the disaster in a hungover haze,
    wondering where to start to set things right.

    With the certainty of day following night
    even the ‘greatest party on earth ‘
    will come to an end.

    Thanks for this article, 1Loneranger.

  • BoldSzkot // February 26, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Reply

    ‘Asking you to identify – to hone in on specifics is likened to asking a monkey what is the correct time?’
    Likened by whom, may I ask?
    Don’t speak for me.
    I think that The Ranger was being very specific :

    ‘The most important questions we must ask ourselves as modern Americans are:

    Which vision and characteristics will Americans choose to embrace as they lose grip of the reins of global power to a rapidly developing Asian power? And, what type of President will Americans elect to represent that collective vision?’

    I think I agree with Jose when he says ‘… That some cannot see it so, it is entirely their fault.’

  • Teresa // February 26, 2007 at 3:35 pm | Reply

    Don’t ask me. I’m Minnesotan, and if you ask anyone anywhere else in America, they will tell you that Minnesota has more in common with Manitoba than they do with any state in the US.

  • fma7 // February 26, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Reply

    [Which vision and characteristics will Americans choose to embrace as they lose grip of the reins of global power to a rapidly developing Asian power? And, what type of President will Americans elect to represent that collective vision?’]
    hey bum-hole your president was not really elected and is a war criminal.. and it is not that becauseof the rising Asian Power that America is loosing its grip …your reigns of global power are your military- industrial criminal and unbrideled destruction throughout the woprld it’s because most of the world sees that unless they stand up to a violent unbridled killing train that genocide will continue unrestrained througout the world.
    Maybe humility and making ammends might be characteristics or a vision to embrace rather than trolling for base, infantile & sarcastic , hah ,hahs in order to elevate your sense of myopically mocking that which is beyond you.

  • 1loneranger // February 26, 2007 at 6:11 pm | Reply

    OK All-

    Let’s tone it down a bit here. I think we can all agree on many of the same things. I think we’re all riding a train of misinterpreted statements to no where.

    fma7-

    It is not my theory that America is losing its grip because of Asia’s new found power. To the contrary, mine is the complete opposite. I think Asia is smartly filling the gap that America has made for its self through fiscal irresponsibility, hypocritical and irresponsible foreign policy. I’m not sure how you misinterpreted that. You should have a look at a bit more of my back pages.
    Or maybe I’m just totally fucxing crazy and have been writing the exact opposite of what I’m thinking.
    Very possible.

    I think all commenting here wholeheartedly agree with you fma7, that BushCo. is a complete and utter bung hole. I’m not sure if you think I think the opposite or not, as I’m having a hard time following what you’re saying sometimes. You should also be aware, the fine people commeting here are from all over the globe.
    ——————————————

    I am now realizing that this late night post is full of holes and too many generalities. This is my own fault as I’m not a very good writer. But also because my Post was really more of a Comment on a well written and interesting Post on a friend’s site that I’m assuming some did not read. I should not assume anything when it comes to blogging I’m finding. These are my inconsistencies and no one else’s.

    I would rather the threads on my site not get into name calling-sand box sessions, but, you guys are free to do whatever you want here. No rules. Have at it.

    Thank you all for commenting though and please don’t stop on my account.

    little indian-

    Glad to see you back, it’s been a while. I always enjoy your poetic responses. Thanks.

  • MerkinOnParis // February 26, 2007 at 7:22 pm | Reply

    Ranger you are too hard on yourself.

    ‘Or maybe I’m just totally fucxing crazy and have been writing the exact opposite of what I’m thinking.
    Very possible.’

    You are a model of clarity in your thought and writing.
    However, it is dead easy for someone to knee-jerk into an aggressive comment if they have not followed the argument or previous threads.
    Most people have done that at some time or other (and I include myself in that category).

    fma7 ; just read the article properly and remember that context is all important.
    Ranger should not have to do your research work for you.

  • Jose // February 27, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Reply

    My experience, 1loneranger, is that there are people for everything. There are kind people that may or may not agree and say so with kind words, there are rude people that may or may not agree and say so with their ownwords, and there are rude people who may or may not agree and show all their foul feelings by saying so in words that no self-respectable people can accept. If nothing else, I bet complete ignorance of their interventions is the best weapon against them.

Leave a Comment